NBC Los Angeles /

News

Prop 8 Sponsors Want to Nix 18,000 Gay Marriages Yes on 8 campaign files brief Friday

Updated 7:37 AM PDT, Sat, Dec 20, 2008

AFP/Getty Images

Will all the weddings have been for nought?

 

A new war of words over gay marriage erupted on Friday as the sponsors of Proposition 8 asked the California Supreme Court to nullify the marriages of the estimated 18,000 same-sex couples who exchanged vows before voters last month approved the ballot initiative that outlawed gay unions.

Quick Poll

Meanwhile, California Attorney General Jerry Brown called upon the California Supreme Court to invalidate Proposition 8 because he said it deprives people of the right to marry.

"Proposition 8 must be invalidated because the amendment process cannot be used to extinguish fundamental constitutional rights without compelling justification," Attorney General Brown said.

The Yes on 8 campaign filed a brief Friday arguing that because the new law holds that only marriages between a man and a woman are recognized or valid in California, the state can no longer recognize the existing same-sex unions.

The campaign submitted the brief in response to three lawsuits seeking to invalidate Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment that overruled the court's decision in May that legalized gay marriage.

Brown said that in order to invalidate what he said is such a fundamental right, the Court must determine that there is a compelling justification to do so.

However, he said the court found that no such compelling justification exists. Therefore, Brown said Proposition 8 must be invalidated.

Both Brown and gay rights groups are maintaining that the gay marriage ban may not be applied retroactively.

The Supreme Court could hear arguments in the cases as soon as March.

Copyright Associated Press

Comments (201)

Sort by: Most Recent | Oldest
  • To Dan, Thursday, Jan 1 at 3:07 PM FLAG COMMENT As far as your explanation of “sister wives,” I don’t think Mormon polygamy excluded the influence of a father in the family. I think the purpose of polygamy in the time (not plural) it was implemented in the early days of the Mormon church was for women to have the support of a family when there were way fewer men than women. I would say it's a great credit to the character of the women that they could form sister-like bon ... MORE >
  • Donna again Thursday, Jan 1 at 3:02 PM FLAG COMMENT Dan, As far as the childless straight couple goes: The traditional definition of marriage is to bind a man and a woman together in order to share the responsibility of raising the children who are expected to follow. So, strictly speaking, choosing to marry and not have children is contrary to the traditional definition of marriage. However, it IS following the natural order of families, and it’s just not feasible to ask a ... MORE >
  • Donna Thursday, Jan 1 at 3:00 PM FLAG COMMENT Dan, you said, “there are many, many gay and straight couples who would like to marry and have NO intention of having children. What about those folks?” Let me answer that question with a question: What about the gay and straight couples who choose to live together without marriage with all the equal rights of marriage through domestic partnerships? Are they not as happy or satisfied with their relationships as gay and lesbi ... MORE >
  • Dan in CA Monday, Dec 29 at 1:31 AM FLAG COMMENT Dear Ryk, Glad that you favor marriage equality. Good for you! Too bad you don't live here, and could have voted against Prop 8! We needed you... I'm glad we haven't been thrown off this forum for discussing topics completely unrelated to the newspaper article. At any rate, I suppose we should have taken this elsewhere. I am recording an all-Liszt CD tomorrow and the next day, so I should probably sign off for the tim ... MORE >
  • Ryk Monday, Dec 29 at 1:01 AM FLAG COMMENT I understand what you are saying exactly. My wifes music is not profitable either. What you are saying mirrors my opinion in that it is the same but opposite. Professionally from my standpoint your friends are not professional musicians regardless, of their skill, they are a doctor and a lawyer. My dentist fronts a rock band, but he is still a dentist by trade. This does not make these people any less valuable as artists ... MORE >

Post a Comment

Name


Comment - You have 2000 characters left

Enter both words below, separated by a space, in the field located to the lower right. Can't read the words below? Try different words or an audio captcha. What's this?