Cinematic Segregation? New Plan for Oscars Misses the Mark - NBC Southern California

Cinematic Segregation? New Plan for Oscars Misses the Mark

Instead of creating a new category for "popular" films, limit Best Picture contenders to box office champs



    Cinematic Segregation? New Plan for Oscars Misses the Mark
    Marvel Studios/Disney via AP, File
    Chadwick Boseman in a scene from "Black Panther."

    The plan to add a "popular" movie category to the Academy Awards is enough to make many movie fans choke on their popcorn.

    At best, it smacks of pandering. At worst, it reeks of potential cinematic segregation – especially in a year when "Black Panther" emerged as a Best Picture contender, at least among the moviegoers who propelled it to a more than $1.3 billion box office take worldwide.

    The Academy could better narrow the growing disconnect between its members and the masses by flipping the script.

    A modest proposal: Limit Best Picture contenders to films that made at least, say, $100 million. Create a special category for flicks that pulled in under $100 million. The Best Picture competition would remain the main event.

    'Late Night’: Ken Jeong Wants to Host the Oscars

    [NATL] 'Late Night’: Ken Jeong Wants to Host the Oscars

    Ken Jeong talk about interviewing Santas in "Ken Jeong Cracks Christmas," the success of "Crazy Rich Asians" and the possibility of him hosting the Oscars.

    (Published 4 hours ago)

    It's a potential win-win: Fans might tune into a broadcast where high-quality films they saw are vying for the top honor. Worthy under-the-radar films would get exposure to a wider audience.

    There’s a precedent of sorts in Hollywood history: The first Academy Awards, in 1929, honored the Outstanding Picture (“Wings”) and the Best Unique and Artistic Picture (“Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans”).

    Any cries of artistic impurity over a box-office threshold would ring hollow in any industry that's all about money the other 364 days of the year.

    In recent years, Academy voters have forgotten about the people who pay the bills.

    That's likely a reaction, at least in part, to the growing success of big-budget, special-effects-driven epics. What often gets lost is that well-financed, high-tech movies also can yield high quality.

    Yet the only Best Picture-winners in the past two decades to fit that mold are 1997’s "Titanic" and 2003’s "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King."
    A box-office cutoff wouldn't necessary penalize modestly budgeted films. "Rocky," which won Best Picture in 1977, and "Get Out," which should have won in March, both came out of nowhere to pack theaters.

    'Late Night’: Ya Burnt? Sledding, Bethlehem Innkeepers

    [NATL] 'Late Night’: Ya Burnt? Sledding, Bethlehem Innkeepers

    Seth Meyers sizzles through a list of topics and fires sick burns at some deserving subjects, like the song "12 Days of Christmas."

    (Published 4 hours ago)

    A cutoff also could benefit comedies, long given little Oscar respect, and top-notch comic-book-inspired efforts – like “Black Panther.”

    The bottom line is that the movie business is in trouble when people would rather watch Netflix than the Oscars.

    Still, there's an opportunity for a Hollywood ending. To paraphrase the battle cry that fueled a popular Oscar-winning performance: Show us the money!

    Hester is Director of News Products and Projects at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY. He is also the author of "Raising a Beatle Baby: How John, Paul, George and Ringo Helped us Come Together as a Family." Follow him on Twitter.