Deliberations resumed Thursday on the remaining deadlocked counts in the Bell corruption trial amid the revelation that at least one of the jurors is second guessing the initial guilty verdicts handed down Wednesday.
"I have been debating in my own mind that due to the pressure and stress of the deliberation process, the jury may have given an improper verdict of guilty on the Solid Waste Authority," wrote a juror who wished to remain anonymous in a letter to Superior Court Judge Kathleen Kennedy.
On Wednesday, five of the defendants were found guilty on multiple counts of misappropriation of public funds in relation to the council's dealings with the Solid Waste and Recycling Authority. They were found not guilty of misappropriation for pay received from the Public Finance Authority.
One of the so-called "Bell 6," Luis Artiga, was acquitted on all charges.
Jury Ordered Back to Court Even After "Bell 6" Verdicts
The anonymous juror's note (embedded below) is now casting doubt on the guilty verdicts.
"It is better to be certain beyond a reasonable doubt to give a verdict of guilty than send someone innocent to prosecution," wrote the juror.
Kennedy would not let lawyers pursue the ramifications of the note on Thursday, but it could be grounds to request a new trial in the future.
"This is the second note that we've gotten indicating that there is some doubt by jurors," said former Bell Mayor Oscar Hernandez's attorney Stanley Friedman, referencing a note sent to the judge Wednesday from juror No. 7 raising the possibility of juror misconduct in the view of several of the defense attorneys.
"So now we have two out of 12 indicating that they have some doubt about how they voted. … That is evidence of a compromised verdict, which is not legal. Where somebody says, 'You vote my way on this, and I'll vote your way on this,'" Friedman said.